Review: Cik&Cap, the Easiest Way to Perfect Turns

Cik&Cap: the Easiest Way to Perfect Turns (Silvia Trkman)

I’m reviewing the DVD version, not the download.

Whilst it’s clearly not made to a professional-DVD standard (although really, are any agility dvds?), the quality is good and clear, it’s well edited and Silvia is an informative and engaging presenter. It’s a short dvd, running to 60mins only, split into seven sections (Intro, Why to Teach it?, Where & When to Use It, How to Teach it?, Troubleshooting, Related Tricks and Outro.

Silvia doesn’t waste time introducing herself or her dogs in the Intro, which is the first clue that this is aimed at people who are already familiar with both agility and Silvia herself already. There is also an emphasis right from the start that this is a training tool that is applicable to puppies and already competing dogs, and that dogs can go on competing throughout training as it’s a new action being introduced, not a retraining.

The Why sections produce clear visual evidence, comparing Silvia’s Border Collie Bu who utilises the cik/cap turns with another WSD, Witch, who doesn’t turn tightly but has faster groundspeed, and discusses exactly how much time is made up and where by each dog. It’s compelling to watch and the point is well made, but for someone who already knows they want to train cik/cap (as I assume most viewers will?) it’s a little overemphasised.

There is a long chapter on when and where to cue a cik/cap turn on a course, looking at both course plans and videos. This is the only part of the dvd that I felt dragged a little; it was useful, but the information could have been presented with analysis of 1-2 courses rather than 3-4, especially since some of the videos had already been seen in the previous comparison section. The DVD generally seems to be aimed at agility people who already have some experience but this section is probably going to be more useful for those who aren’t overly familiar with how to walk and then run a course.

The How section shows how to begin training with puppies and/or retrain dogs, but does assume that the viewer will either be familiar with clicker training or with successful luring for trick training. It moves through all the aspects of training, including how to incorporate it in sequences and courses. It’s really nice to see non-agility equipment being used, this is obviously something that everyone can train regardless of how much access to agility equipment they have.

The Troubleshooting section isn’t expansive, partially because Silvia outlines how to avoid problems as she goes through the dvd anyway, and the Related Tricks is just a signpost to the Tricks DVD.

Overall, clear, concise presentation and demonstration for a very useful tool. I’m still not entirely sure if this is aimed at experienced agility people or newcomers, but I’d be especially inclined to recommend it to anyone getting their second agility dog, or to Grade 1-2 handlers who have an eye on the climbing the levels. More experienced people will still find the training information on how to teach cik/cap useful, but will also probably find they can skip through some chapters without missing much.

Acceptable Risk

Run

I have been thinking on this for a while, after a bit of a twitter debate with friends. Two horses very sadly died this year in the Grand National, leading to a whole bunch of people to say the race is too dangerous and should immediately cease. I ought to begin by saying I don’t bet on the National (apart from office sweepstakes) and I do think that there are further things that can be done to improve the safety of the horses and jockeys (limiting the field would be a start, because 40 is a ridiculous number that is just asking for trouble), but I have and probably will continue to defend its existence as a steeplechase. I don’t want to get too hung up on the Grand National though, otherwise this will be a really boring post for most people.

The biggest risk with the National – and I promise, this has a dog-related point – is that there are always hopeless long shots entered into the race. Yes, they have a qualifying procedure, but most owners and trainers know if they’re horse can make the trip or not and will enter them regardless, because they think there’s an off chance they’ll get the opportunity to say they’ve won this race (plus the massive prize money won’t go amiss either). They’re willing to risk their horse being injured, or at worst, die, because there is a chance for glory.

But we see this same mentality in dog sports, don’t we? Ok, the risk of death is almost non-existent. Likewise, there is no financial gain (usually). But there is also no drug-testing and little regulation of lame or unsound dogs running. Thinking honestly, how many people to do you know that are normally sane, compassionate and reasoned, but have run their dog on Metacam* for a Final, or Qualifier? I can think of a dozen at least. I know a lot of flyballers who have Metacam in their cars, just in case their dog goes lame after the morning’s racing and they need a quick dose so they can flyball in the afternoon, particularly for the Champs. People get so caught up on the need to win the big events that they will sacrifice their dog’s health for that one day or weekend.

A more directly obvious comparison with the National (barring death risk and prize money extremes, and if you squint quite a lot) is Crufts. We train our dogs to the best we can, but we still all desperately try to qualify for an event that we know has an unsuitable environment for agility. We know the majority of dogs do not run well on carpet, and that the equipment has a tendency to slip (weaves, tunnels). The injury risk is much greater, the crowds/stress is much greater, but we still try and qualify for it.

Tangent: how many people will run their dogs outdoors when it’s raining? I know this horrifies plenty of the American handlers, but we do it regularly.

I wonder what level of risk is acceptable? (Why yes, often my trains of thought are sometimes tangential and weird; how did I get from the Grand National to this?) Dogs running on medication is a no, for me. I’d run Kim at Crufts again but I wouldn’t try to qualify Dylan. I’ll run in the rain but only to a certain point, if there is a torrential downpour and the contact equipment in particular looks slippery, I’ll pull my dogs (I’ll admit I don’t like running in the rain either as well, so that might have something to do with it).

I don’t really know where I’m going with this, or what my final point is. Sorry if you just wasted 10minutes reading all that.

*I’m using Metacam as my example drug of choice, but only because it seems to be the most common. Some people prefer different painkillers, some go with homeopathy options like arnica. I hope it’s obvious that whatever the drug is, is irrelevant.

**The level of risk with regards to the National will always be fluid, unfortunately, due to the fragile nature of horses. No deaths would be a good place to start, but of course horses with broken legs (usually) have to be euthanized, so do we go to no broken legs? Risk of a broken leg on flat racing is still pretty risky. Breed horses with stronger legs, but lose the speed? The risk of our hardier agility dogs getting a broken leg from agility is also somewhat risky, but of course dogs with broken legs are adaptable and can go back to what they did after recovery. I think it’s fair to say my comparison throughout this post is therefore tenuous at best, but it is what got me thinking so I included it anyway.

Busy Busy

Seesaw work this week. Some improvement but I have a list of things still left to work on.

I’ve also been working on introducing tighter turns, ala Silvia Trkman. We’ve done lots of work at home (and on walks, etc etc) but Dyl actually had a lot of the basic skills already, it was just refining what was there, adding a command and changing my reward position. The difficult bit with Dyl has always been the jumping, I think because he has a tendency to jump from his front end and because he is over-cautious about poles. That means he generally doesn’t turn in the air, he turns before or after the jump (yes, also down to my training I’m sure!). We’re currently working on 25cm height and it looks good, but the challenge will really be when we get to 45cm+ I think, that seems to be when he begins to struggle.

I have also, hesitantly, decided to use just one command for turning tight both ways (kip). This is based on my weaknesses and not Dylan’s! I already have a tendency to confuse myself with lefts and rights (not my strongest point), particularly when I’m thinking on my feet, and I don’t want Dylan to get confused by what the command means because I’m inept. So I’m going to rely on body language for direction and the command for the action of turning tight to the wing. Silvia does mention this very briefly in her DVD and says it’s ok to do that, so we’ll see how it works.